Share on facebook

MQA on the environmental impact of streaming - Music Week

For assistance please contact Our Customer Service on:
Please enter your email so we can send you password reset link.
An email has been sent to you containing a link to reset your password
For assistance please contact Our Customer Service on:
Music Week Awards sponsors MQA invite us to consider the impact of streaming on the planet…
Did you know that music streaming has a carbon footprint? In fact, it’s twice as large as the carbon footprint of the CD era. While it’s easy to understand the effects of manufacturing and distributing physical formats such as CD and vinyl, many people don’t realise that streaming also has an environmental impact. Digital music files are stored on servers. Every time you stream a track it has to be transmitted across a network to a router, then delivered to your playback device or hi-fi set-up. This whole process uses energy and generates greenhouse gas emissions.
Streaming vs physical
According to studies carried out by Dr Kyle Devine for his book Decomposed: The Political Ecology Of Music, today’s streaming-centric music industry is twice as polluting as the CD era. Devine converted both the production of plastics (for physical products) and electricity consumption (for the storage and delivery of music files) into greenhouse gas equivalents, to make these comparisons.
As revealed by Keele University lecturers Sharon George and Deirdre McKay, frequency of listening can point the consumer to the greenest option. If you listen to a track once or twice, streaming is best. If you play your music on repeat, then a physical copy could end up being the more sustainable choice.
If you play your music on repeat, then a physical copy could end up being the more sustainable choice.

As streaming grows, the situation is only set to escalate: more people are streaming more music than ever before; and more services are launching around the world.
What are the solutions?
At an industry level, the following are just a few of the initiatives continuing to gain support and momentum:
What happens now?
While it’s clear that environmental concerns about streaming are being taken more seriously, what’s less clear is how soon these activities will have an impact. To ensure that sustainability does not come at the expense of the listener experience, innovation must be a fundamental part of any solution. In a Music Ally-led discussion with leading environmental scientist Dr Allen Hershkowitz, MQA CEO Mike Jbara underlined this fact: “We shouldn’t kid ourselves that we’re going to get consumers comfortable with less – meaning experiences get worse, quality gets worse. Music, more than ever, needs to be innovating faster and creating more experiences.”
For the meantime, however, we can point individuals to the services that are streaming music in a responsible way, such as Tidal Masters which integrates MQA’s sustainable technology. More on that as the conversation develops.
For more stories like this, and to keep up to date with all our market leading news, features and analysis, sign up to receive our daily Morning Briefing newsletter



Stream reveals details of six possible new Sixth Street music venues - Austin Monitor

Death Metal Icons BLOODBATH To Release Survival Of The Sickest Album In September; "Zombie Inferno" Music Video Streaming -

Most Viewed